? 目录站群还有没有用

that has been recognized by the international commu

the part of ▓the Un

nity, including the United States.64. Second, the claim that “Kalayaan Island Group&▓rdquo; is “terra nullius” discovered by the Philippines is groundless. The Phili

ppines claims that its n▓ationals “discovered

ited States, as isla

” the islands in 1956, and uses this as an excuse ▓to single out some islands and reefs of China’s Nansha Qundao and name them “Kalayaan Island Group”. This is a

n attempt to create confusion over geographical na

nds constituting par

mes and concepts, and dismember China’s Nansha Qundao. As a matter of fact, the geographical scope of Nansha Qundao is clear, and the so-called “Kalayaan ▓Island Group&rdquo

; is part of China’s Nansha Qundao. Nansha Q

t of the Philippine

undao has long been an integral part of Chi▓na’s territory and is by no means “terra nullius”.65. Third, Nansha Qundao is not “trust territory” either. The

Archipelago”. On

  • Philippines▓ claims that after the Second World War, Nansha

    Qundao bec▓ame “trust territory

  • ”, the sovereignty over which was undetermined. This c

    laim finds no support in law or realit

  • y. The post-War trust territories were all specifically list

    ed in relevant international treaties

20 August, Secretary Hull

  • or the documents of the United Nations Trusteeship Council.

    Nansha Qundao was never included in

  • them and was thus not trust territory at all.66. Fourth, neith

    er “contigu▓ity or proximity&rd

  • quo; nor national security is a basis under international la

    w for acquiring territory. Many countr

officially replied in writing to Se

ies have territories far away from ▓their metropoli

tan areas, in some cases even very close to the shores of other countries. When exercising colonial rule over the Phi▓lippines, the United States had a dispute with the Netherlands regardi▓ng sovereignty over an island which is close to the Philippine Archipela▓go, and the United States’ claim on the basis of contiguity was ruled as having no foundation in international law. Furthermore, it is just absurd to invade and occupy the t

cretary Dern,▓ stating that, &ldquo

errit▓ory of other countries on the ground of national security.67. Fifth, the Philippines claims that so▓me islands and reefs of China’s Nansha Qundao are located within its exclusive▓ economic zone and continental shelf and therefore shou▓ld fall under its sovereignty or form part of its continental shelf. This is an attempt to use maritime jurisdiction provided for under UNCLOS to deny China’s territorial sovereignty. This runs directly counter to the “land dominates the sea&rd▓quo; principle, and goes against the purpose of UNCLOS, as stated in its preamble,

to &ld

qu▓o;establish [...] with due regard for the sovereignty of all▓ States, a legal order for the seas and ocean”. Therefore, a coastal state can only claim maritime jurisdiction under▓ the precondition of respecting the territorial sovereignty of another state. No state can extend its maritime jurisdiction to an area under the sovereignty of another; still less can it use such jurisdiction as an excu▓se to deny another state’s sovereignty or even to infringe upon its territory.68. Sixth, the Philippines’ so-called “effective control” on the basis of its illegal seizure is null an▓d void. The international community does not recognize “effective control” created ▓through occupation by force. The Philippines’ “effective control” is mere occupation by naked use of forc

All these documents prove that the Philippines’ territory never includes any part of Nanha▓i Zhudao, a fact
中国 株洲 网站群平台 逐鹿泛目录996seo 恒久站群管理 博达网站群管理怎么用更改主页新闻 站群模式 泛目录程序官网 单页站群软件 蜘蛛池租用蛛池出租 黑帽seo站群推送工具 站群管理系统 云通站群软件 麒麟超级站群密码 黑豹站群软件 镜像站群效果 侠客站群系统 怎么样 dt站群 美国站群服务器 政府网站群建设 博达网站群管理平台项目名称改动 php镜像站群